Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 10,567
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am
If executive privilege covers anything, it is a talk between president and top advisor on matters of foreign policy. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:05 am
Roberts, “this is a delusion, if a pleasant one. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 1:13 pm
Not the looming impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, which will be drawing Chief Justice John Roberts across the street to the Senate in a matter of days, but the “Bridgegate” affair out of New Jersey. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 8:02 am
Chief Justice John Roberts, who appeared skeptical that standing exists, asked Stris whether his arguments relied on a forward-looking or a retrospective theory of injury. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit didn't, as a formal legal matter, result in any coercive judgment against anyone: No party is subject to any judicial decree, and no one is legally obligated to alter their behavior, as a result. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:00 am
As Roberts says, “You can’t hit a target you can’t see,” which means your goals need to be tangible, and your team needs to know what these goals are. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
He will return to court on January 24, on matters related to his case. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
The third ground for the article, for example, lists nine officials who refused to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry at the direction of the president—Mulvaney, Blair, National Security Council (NSC) lawyers John Eisenberg and Michael Ellis, NSC official Preston Wells Griffith, Vought, Duffey, Energy Department aide Brian McCormack, and State Department official T. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
A second case involved the administration’s appeal of a judge’s October ruling that grand jury information in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe should be provided to lawmakers. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 8:05 am
So what can we do about it, if we can't even be honest enough about it to admit it? [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:23 pm
They don’t elect us. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
Why isn’t justice inevitable? [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:41 pm
He apparently told Jack Tapper yesterday that the term "imminent" had no real meaning, i.e., it simply did not matter if there was any evidence at all that an attack on Americans was likely to occur in the immediate future. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 11:05 am
“In developed countries like the United States, pregnancy shouldn’t be a matter of life or death,” Singer added. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
On December 11, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of LRC Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 7:07 am
Last year it was Chief Justice John Roberts, a dissenter in 2016, who provided the fifth vote to temporarily block Louisiana from enforcing the law. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
Justice DeWine’s Position First off, Justice DeWine doesn’t think the court should have bothered with the case because it doesn’t present a significant constitutional question or issue of public or great general interest, which is why he didn’t vote to accept it. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:53 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger finds Chief Justice John Roberts’ recent reminder that federal judges should “‘judge without fear or favor, deciding each matter with humility, integrity, and dispatch’” particularly relevant in capital cases, in which “[i]deological bias and excessive delay are all too common. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
“These are essentially fundraisers who aren’t on the payroll,” said Sarah Bryner, research director for the Center for Responsive Politics. [read post]
