Search for: "People v. Modell" Results 2501 - 2520 of 4,844
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Supreme Court finally ruled that many restrictions on lawyer advertising violated free speech, in Bates v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:54 am by Schachtman
Reg. 4685 (Jan. 21, 2009). [6] See Burka v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
The officers drove past Washington Park, where a crowd of people were drinking and shooting off fireworks. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am by Andy
Secondly, there are numerous vested interests ranging from big business to collecting societies and a myriad of other players who will resist anything which they perceive as detrimental to their business models. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
   Justify v. specify: lawyers deal with specification. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:21 am
John Fellas & Pavlos Petrovas, Diag Human SE v Czech Republic-Ministry of Health: A Restrictive Application of the ‘Commercial’ Requirement in New York Convention Cases under US LawMichael Hwang & Aloysius Chang, Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic v Sanum Investments Ltd: A Tale of Two Letters Andrew Newcombe & Jean-Michel Marcoux, Hesham Talaat M. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Life plus models took over for understandable reasons. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   If we understand the causes of IP litigation: standard models say that if the size of the stakes increase relative to litigation cost, you get more bargaining failure. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 5:09 am by SHG
Much as this may make advocates sad, Lave’s premise, based on Chancellor Carol McCoy’s decision in Mock v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 8:30 am by Nassiri Law
With this business model, the employer would not have to pay overtime or benefits. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:23 pm by Schachtman
It is not all about putting a DSM-V diagnosis on the chart, and prescribing medication. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:38 am
And we suggest that the North Carolina legislation may provide a model for future legislative action aimed at payments for people sterilized involuntarily in other states. [read post]