Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 17,243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2021, 3:15 pm
As we have documented elsewhere, since the Supreme Court’s early 2018 decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:13 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am
To counter this, an available tool is to restrict the kinds of harm that are in scope, so that (for instance) mere annoyance does not count. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
Elizabeth O’Brien pleaded guilty to one count of sending malicious communications at Hull Magistrates’ Court and was made the subject of a community order where she must carry out 80 hours of unpaid work. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:28 pm
Waremart Foods v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:19 am
In Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
By my rough count, the two volumes have about a thousand words a page, and about 1250 total pages, for about a million-and-a-quarter words in all. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:25 pm
ShareIn Borden v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 4:38 pm
Even a much shorter state-imposed front-yard protest still counts as a "taking" of the homeowner's property rights, under any plausible definition of the word…. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
The accused had little recourse in the legal proceedings; since 1997, the UK Law Commission recommended that a computer should be assumed to be operating properly unless there is explicit evidence otherwise (a claim by a defendant that there was an error doesn't count). [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
The accused had little recourse in the legal proceedings; since 1997, the UK Law Commission recommended that a computer should be assumed to be operating properly unless there is explicit evidence otherwise (a claim by a defendant that there was an error doesn't count). [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 6:02 pm
Dickinson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Gill v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:03 am
United States, 570 F.3d 672 (5th Cir. 2009)(stating that estimates are permissible under the Cohan Rule) ; but see Shami v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:49 pm
I wrote a post about the importance of the first sentence in California v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 10:35 am
For example, Justice Sotomayor stated that NFIB "said at least four times by my count that individuals cannot be compelled to buy health insurance under the Commerce Clause. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
Cuomo (2020) and Tandon v. [read post]
When Congress says "and" they mean "and." And that likely means safety-valve relief for quite a few.
18 Jun 2021, 5:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
