Search for: "STATE v. WOODS" Results 2501 - 2520 of 3,002
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2014, 6:25 am by Joy Waltemath
Not only was it reasonable for the employer’s attorney to believe the employee’s former counsel had authority to settle the case on his behalf, the parties explicitly agreed that the oral settlement was an immediately enforceable and binding contract (Galanis v The Harmonie Club of the City of New York, October 2, 2014, Woods, G). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:46 am by Rick
Surely there will be more as long as capital punishment remains part of our penal law.4 And so, in 1972, the United States joined other modern industrial nations in abolishing the death penalty. [read post]
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Lloyd v Google LLC, heard 21 to 23 May 2018 (Warby J) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:30 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
The driver thereafter filed a motion in arrest of judgment based on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm by WIMS
    On February 23, 2011, in response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne)Thursday, March 29, 4:30 pm"Breaking Developments in International Law: Conversation on ICJ's Opinion in Bosnia v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  Instead, the initial question on the merits is whether, notwithstanding the absence of any such legal duty, the state nevertheless imposes “substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs," Thomas v. [read post]