Search for: "Sell v. Sell" Results 2501 - 2520 of 23,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2018, 12:51 pm by Walter Calvert and Tammara Langlieb
Venable clients that engage in selling goods and/or services over the internet should evaluate whether the recent Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:31 am
  Over the weekend, the Salt Lake Tribune published an opinion piece on Salazar v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
He falsely stated that he was unmarried, was in the process of selling a different house, and was not obligated to pay child support. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
 The wife (alongside her husband) defrauded people on eBay of $1.6 million by deliberately "selling" high-end appliances that they had no intent or ability to deliver, then lied to customers repeatedly -- as well as setting up a system where customers wouldn't actually be buying through eBay (and hence protected). [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:08 am by Federalist Society
” By a vote of 7-2, the Court held in an opinion delivered by Justice Breyer that SLUSA does not preempt the plaintiffs’ state-law class actions, noting that “plaintiffs do not allege that the defendants’ misrepresentations led anyone to buy or to sell (or to maintain positions in)covered securities. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:33 pm
  Even "regular" bones mostly contain minerals -- and here, the fossils are either hydroxylapatite or francolite, both of which are minerals.But when you sell (or maintain) your oil and "mineral" rights to a piece of property, that definitely covers gas, and gold, and copper, and the like. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
  But the guys who sell these cards to municipalities know full well that you won't. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 1:26 pm
One of the downsides to selling drugs to gang members in the area is that they occasionally shoot both you and your wife in the face while robbing your home. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:08 am by Federalist Society
” By a vote of 7-2, the Court held in an opinion delivered by Justice Breyer that SLUSA does not preempt the plaintiffs’ state-law class actions, noting that “plaintiffs do not allege that the defendants’ misrepresentations led anyone to buy or to sell (or to maintain positions in)covered securities. [read post]