Search for: "State v. Born"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 4,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2017, 10:13 am
In Summum v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:45 am
To avoid the same fate as the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan, which was struck down by the conservative Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 10:04 pm
In the first, Debra H. v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 8:40 am
Moore v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm
However, recently, on December 23, 2009, a trial Court in Hudson County entered a decision in the A.G.R. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 1:28 pm
As I explained in a recent article in Just Security, this would be a blatant violation of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which grants citizenship to anyone "born … in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 5:13 pm
The first challenge to a photo ID law to reach the Supreme Court—Crawford v. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 9:02 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 2:21 pm
Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Neb. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 8:55 am
Born in the U.S., 19 Op. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:21 pm
Each week, Wise Law Blog reviews recent decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.United States of America v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
As the work of my colleague Kris Collins illuminates, citizenship for children born abroad to Americans remains deeply contested and unequally regulated. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 10:51 am
An example of a general legacy is “I give [pounds] 100 to X”: Wood Estate v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm
Rothfeld v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:40 am
Braulia A., a mother of four U.S. citizen children and one son born in Guatemala, lived in the United States for almost 15 years. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:33 pm
But the Supreme Court itself in the Plyler v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:23 am
These cases have all arisen very quickly since the United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Parents v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
One way to get around spending 10 years in the US to overcome 212(a)(9)(B) inadmissibility is if the applicant is eligible for a waiver under INA §212(a)(b)(b)(v), which is based on a showing of extreme hardship to a qualifying relative such as a spouse or parent is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident. [read post]
