Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 2501 - 2520 of 15,319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2021, 7:40 am by Ilya Somin
OR tax cuts can be offset by (a) real spending cuts; (b) other tax changes or (c) economic growth… It seems that the only way a state could fall afoul of this is if they aggressively cut taxes below the 2019 budget year baseline without taking any offsetting steps or doing so in response to real economic changes. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am by Bryce Klehm
  The United States faces persistent and increasingly sophisticated malicious cyber campaigns that threaten the public sector, the private sector, and ultimately the American people’s security and privacy. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
In fact, the dissent pointed out that the Ninth Circuit majority’s decision deviates from the First Circuit’s 2016 decision in Schwann v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 Mr Crosland, an environmental lawyer, acted for Plan B in the case heard at the UK Supreme Court about Heathrow’s third runway, R (on the application of Friends of the Earth ltd and Ors) v Heathrow Airport Ltd. [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:52 pm by JP Sarmiento
(c)(1)(i), an absence between 6 months and 1 year from the United States raises a rebuttable presumption that continuity of residence has been interrupted. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:03 pm by Patricia Hughes
The LAO board is required to establish advisory committees , including one in clinic law (1998 Act, s.7(1), (LAO was to determine the composition and functions of these advisory committees), as well as another clinic committee), the functions of which were to (a) recommend policies and guidelines to the board in respect of the Corporation’s [LAO’s] funding of clinics; (b) recommend standards to the board for the operation of clinics; (c) make… [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:42 am by Florian Mueller
(b) Can a lack of a licence request be inferred from licence terms presented by the SEP user by way of a counter-offer, with the result that the action for a prohibitory injunction brought by the SEP holder is subsequently allowed without first assessing whether the SEP holder’s own licence offer (which preceded the SEP user’s counter-offer) complies with FRAND terms in the first place? [read post]