Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 4,683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Although an administrative decision maker is not deemed biased or disqualified merely on the basis that he or she reviewed a previous administrative determination and ruled against the same employee, or presided over a prior proceeding involving a similar defense or similar charges, in this instance the Appellate Division found that there was evidence indicating that the administrative decision maker may have prejudged the matter at issue. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
Normally, a proposal like this get rubber-stamped through a state bar’s review process, so its approval seemed inevitable. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:56 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 2:08 am
(9) Is it assumed that the investment of the database maker is seriously harmed in the event of the aforementioned conduct? [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
Monsantoand Keurig, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 10:39 am
The case, Weidman v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 1:16 am
Grewal, known for his work on discovery disputes (including the "Patentgate" affair, which also involves QE) on the Apple v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm
(9) Is it assumed that the investment of the database maker is seriously harmed in the event of the aforementioned conduct? [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 8:27 pm
On Afro-IP, Caroline NCube's series on African states' IP policy takes her alphabetically from Cameroon to Comoros. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
In this respect, adjudication differs from voting, which allows a decision-maker to decide without having to articulate her reasons (or even without having any reasons). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:26 pm
At this stage I'm still unaware of a Nokia v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:58 am
In Galitsky, et al. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am
People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:09 am
This week I decided to work on Tuesday (Senate hearing on patent reform) and Friday (Nokia v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 4:52 am
Ang v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:44 pm
National Australia Bank and Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:56 pm
There are also some Nokia v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
What are the potential trade-offs and hurdles that policy makers need to consider as we look to the future? [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
