Search for: "State v. Sales" Results 2501 - 2520 of 20,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2021, 6:08 am by John Jascob
Zenergy International, Inc. and an $80,000 penalty against the orchestrator of a pump-and-dump scheme in SEC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:10 am by Amy Howe
Bernstein, the federal government will weigh in on whether the Airline Deregulation Act trumps mandatory state-law breaks for flight crews, while the question in California Trucking Association v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 4:26 am by Peter Mahler
Kahn III, last week handed down its decision in Kinyk v Hart, this time denying the motion on the merits. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:32 am by Florian Mueller
But the broader concept of unfairness under state competition law might have scope for preventing Apple from doing this. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 6:24 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980)) preempts the State of California’s regulation of intertribal cigarette sales, where an Indian tribe sells tribally manufactured cigarettes to Indian tribal buyers on their home reservations. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:01 am by Neil Wilkof
The state of the register alone is not sufficient evidence – it all comes down to use in the market. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
” In a working paper, Steven Salop, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and several coauthors discussed the impacts of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by Bona Law PC
This new clause is identical to the Chinese Supreme Court’s decision on Yutai v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-1410, and Kahn v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
For many years, Wisconsin forbade the in-state sale of yellow margarine. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm by Riana Harvey
The opposition relied on Article 8(4) EUTMR, stating that it was entitled under the applicable law in the UK to prevent the use of the mark applied for by means of ‘extended’ passing off (a concept that shall be elaborated on below). [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:57 am
  Even in Studio City.The other thing that popped into my head was a line in the opinion from the defendant about why she was not at home during one of the various service attempts: "She stated she was out of town during the process server’s third stake-out on May 14, 2019, as she was in New York City to appear on the Wendy Williams show. [read post]