Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 2501 - 2520 of 14,190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2008, 9:40 am
Radeker and modified in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am by Susan Klein
Responding to the government’s argument that the Supreme Court has on previous occasions recognized that a sentencing reduction based upon Section 3582(c)(2) is not governed by the constitutional or remedial holding of United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm by Matthew Kahn
 This was the first such review of its kind in United States history. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Kara M. Maciel
  For the second time in a year, a United States District Court has held that claims based on California’s meal and rest period laws are preempted by federal law. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Fear and increased risk of cancer in asbestos cases have been considered by the United States Supreme Court, by the United States Court of Appeals, by federal District Courts, by state Supreme and appellate courts, all around the country, but rarely or never with the good sense and confidence exhibited by a lone Common Pleas judge in Philadelphia, back in 1986. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 1:23 pm by David Kramer
Interestingly, both the Kentucky Supreme Court and the Kentucky Court of Appeals had previously cited with approval the two main decisions of the United States Supreme Court that had adopted the higher standard, Ashcroft v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by NCC Staff
With its 25 electoral votes up for grabs, the winner in Florida would become the next President of the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:30 pm by Steve Vladeck
Circuit in the Uighur litigation held that a right to release is not the same thing as a right to release into the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Holland & Hart
Supreme Court struck down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act last year in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm by WIMS
"       The Appeals Court affirmed the district court's rulings on Southern Union's conviction, as set forth in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:56 am by Ronald Mann
Although they are paid as civilian employees, they routinely wear military uniforms and are obligated to maintain membership with an appropriate rank in the state National Guard where they are located, which carries with it (by law) membership in the Army National Guard of the United States. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:58 pm by Wells Bennett
Mark Martins, had this to say on the eve of a pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]