Search for: "ADAMS v. ADAMS"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 8,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
The record clearly establishes an attorney-client relationship, as defendant entered into two stipulations extending Billiard’s time to answer in an underlying personal injury action, which were filed in court, and represented itself as Billiard’s attorney (see Cooke v Laidlaw Adams & Peck, 126 AD2d 453, 455 [1st Dept 1987]; compare Pellegrino v Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 49 AD3d 94, 99 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
For example, Blackman argues that the president’s exclusive recognition power as described by the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at Byrd v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:06 am
This evidence is sufficient for a fact-finder to determine that defendant breached its duty of loyalty to plaintiff, a former client (see Cooke v Laidlaw, Adams & Peck, 126 AD2d 453, 456 [1st Dept 1987] [ethical standards applying to the practice of law impose a continuing obligation upon lawyers to refuse employment in matters adversely affecting a client’s interests, even if the client is a former client]). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
Hill, Jr. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:08 pm
The Roadshow Films v Telstra (2016) case is cited, but perhaps mention could also have been made of the Universal Music v TPG Internet (2017) case, in addition to the interesting, albeit cursory, discussion in both cases on which party should bear the costs of complying with the orders (a similar costs issue is due to be considered in the coming weeks by the UK Supreme Court in the Cartier v British Telecommunications case). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Docket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUDocket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 3:07 am
Justice Louis Brandeis’ dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 4:26 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Mannheimer previews City of Hays v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
It Takes “Alternative Math” to Claim That Redistribution Is Futile March 16, 2017 | Adam M. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
It Takes “Alternative Math” to Claim That Redistribution Is Futile March 16, 2017 | Adam M. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 5:15 pm
Michael Adams and Megan Reiss considered how international law should address these types of attacks. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 6:23 am
Thyssenkrupp Waupaca Inc. dba Waupaca Foundry Inc. and Adams v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:25 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at Hughes v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
Accord Tourgeman v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
Accord Tourgeman v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:35 am
” A Daily Journal podcast features a discussion of this term’s second partisan-gerrymandering case, Benisek v. [read post]
