Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 2521 - 2540 of 11,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2007, 9:21 am
  The MDA explicitly preempts any “state law requirements” that differ from FDA requirements regarding specific products.In 1996, in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome: This appeal is from a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas that, on remand from this court, granted-in-part Morris & Associates, Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 10-6866, and Setser v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:57 pm by Woodrow Pollack
 [Marietta Drapery & Window Coverings Co., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration ordecision of this motion.06-713 ) WASHINGTON STATE GRANGE V. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 11:14 am by Diane Marie Amann
 It cites the Court’s judgment in First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 4:22 am by Patricia Salkin
Appellants Cornell Restaurant Ventures, LLC; MJP & JCW, Inc.; Jilco, Inc.; and MRG of South Florida, Inc. were the owners and operators of the adult-entertainment clubs known as “Pure Platinum” and “Solid Gold,” appealed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the City of Oakland Park on the Owners’ complaint challenging the City’s sexually oriented business licensing regulations. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:36 am
On June 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
ENDNOTES [1] The companies are 2U, Inc., Adobe, Inc., Airbnb, Inc., Allbirds, Inc., Brightcove, Inc., Brighthouse Financial, Inc., Change Healthcare Inc., Comcast Corporation, FactSet Research Systems, Inc., Henry Schein, Inc., Ideanomics, Inc., Kraft Heinz Co., Lyft, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Morningstar, Inc., Sleep Number Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, United Therapeutics… [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:45 am by Marc Whipple
So last Wednesday (March 22, 2017, if you’re joining us late) the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:43 am by Gregory Eisenreich
" Schwab's insertion of this waiver language followed the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post by Professor Tomás Gómez-Arostegui (Lewis & Clark Law School) One of the questions in Impression Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:46 pm by WIMS
      Access the complete opinion (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]