Search for: "Antonin Scalia"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 6,600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 11:54 am
Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, dissented. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
In addition, we've independently confirmed that Justice Antonin Scalia is also all finished for OT 2009. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:19 pm
In 2004, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia famously refused to disqualify himself from a case involving Vice President Dick Cheney, although the two were friends who had taken trips together. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 8:05 am
We talked about several subjects, including my book Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom, whether George Mason University (where I teach) was justified in renaming its law school after the late Justice Antonin Scalia, and the state of originalism. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:19 pm
In 2004, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia famously refused to disqualify himself from a case involving Vice President Dick Cheney, although the two were friends who had taken trips together. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:21 am
The keynote address, "The Methodology of Originalism," will be presented by Associate Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 1:40 am
In response to Justice Antonin Scalia's remarks during a panel sponsored by the National Italian American Foundation, Lithwick writes: Scalia said, "The press is never going to report judicial opinions accurately. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
In his dissent in Lawrence, Justice Antonin Scalia said the case would mean the legalization of “bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality and obscenity. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 9:35 am
He'll be greeting law students at George Mason for decades to come. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
What a colorful commencement speech. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 1:14 pm
Their resemblance on this issue is uncanny. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
But the angriest and most upset I ever heard him was about an old concurring opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia in Herrera v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:55 pm
State (1873) and Korematsu would not qualify, because leading jurists such as Richard Posner (who argues that Korematsu was right), and Antonin Scalia (whose logic suggests Bradwell should go the other way today only because intervening precedent he thinks is wrong) are willing to defend them. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:15 am
And Justice Alito also issued a dissent, in which Justice Antonin Scalia joined, from the denial of certiorari in Rapelje v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:16 am
Although progressives tended to depict Justice Antonin Scalia as an authoritarian ogre, for instance, he sided with defendants in several important Fourth Amendment and Sixth Amendment cases. [read post]
Supreme Court Considers Enforceability of Arbitration Clause’s Class Action Waiver in Antitrust Case
7 Mar 2013, 8:21 am
“Our position is that multiple claimants in arbitration could share the costs of an expert for preparation of a report,” said Kellogg in response.Justice Antonin Scalia suggested that the merchants faced with arbitrating their antitrust claims individually would be in the same position as plaintiffs were before class actions were permissible. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
One note on the lineup: The 4-3 split of the decision suggests that the court would have been split 4-4 after oral argument (because it’s pretty clear Justice Antonin Scalia would have sided with Fisher). [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 6:35 am
Justices Ginsburg and Scalia celebrate Verdi:When Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is waiting patiently for his spoonful of rigatoni and scallops, too, you know you’re in for a real Italian party. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:44 pm
But in 1986, two years after McCollum was convicted and sentenced, Justice Antonin Scalia held him up in a separate Supreme Court decision as the kind of person who demonstrates the need for the death penalty. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
Justice Antonin Scalia added that the question boils down to whether an interpretation that radically alters a prior interpretation is a substantive rule requiring notice and comment. [read post]
