Search for: "Beare v. State" Results 2521 - 2540 of 15,034
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
Hill 20-1587Issues: (1) Whether a state may require convicted sex offenders to obtain and carry a state identification bearing the words “sex offender” without facially violating the First Amendment’s prohibition on compelled speech; and (2) whether a convicted sex offender has a First Amendment right not to be prosecuted for fraudulently altering a state identification card after scratching off a statutorily required sex offender designation. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:26 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Daly (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)United States, Osage Minerals Council v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:08 pm by Unknown
Daly (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)United States, Osage Minerals Council v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 12:12 pm by Giles Peaker
(Watters – R v Wolverhampton MBC, ex p. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1971) ("Any system of prior restraints of expression comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against constitutional validity. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
States were never intended to tax international income, and doing so raises serious constitutional issues in many states. [read post]
24 May 2021, 10:03 am by Lisa Peets, Marty Hansen and Vicky Ling
Importers and distributors must ensure that the high-risk AI system has been subject to the relevant conformity assessment procedure and bears the proper conformity marking before placing it on the market. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
  The social events and legislative history leading to the enactment and promulgation of the NSL as a national law applied to the HKSAR under BL 18 have been summarised in HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying, ante. [read post]
20 May 2021, 12:07 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Therefore the Boards of Appeal shall also apply the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and national courts regarding the fundamental principles laid down in Article 6 of the Human Right Convention;e. suspicion of partiality of a judge has to be determined by two tests: firstly, a subjective test requiring proof of actual partiality of the judge concerned, and secondly an objective test, whether the circumstances of the case give rise to an objectively justified fear of… [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
They implicate fundamental questions about the role of courts in the United States’s constitutional structure. [read post]