Search for: "Does 1-30" Results 2521 - 2540 of 27,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2015, 3:15 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ex. 1037, at [22], 1:19–30, 2:60–3:2, 5:1–21; Ex. 2045 ¶ 63.22Similarly, a capsule form of dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of multiplesclerosis, marketed as Tecfidera™, Ex. 1070, 2, was disclosed in U.S. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:42 am
That was the issue before Arnold J. in his latest judgment considering the SPC Regulation in (1) Sandoz Limited (2) Hexal AG v (1) G.D. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:41 pm
For example, if a medical supplier changes location on January 1 but does not submit an address change to Medicare until June 1, the supplier could lose 4 months worth of Medicare payments. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
 The present decision reminds us that the use of unusual parameters in claims may backfire on the applicant.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (differences with respect to claim 1 as filed are highlighted):1. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
            In order to establish constructive possession of a controlled substance if the controlled substance is in a place over which the (defendant) does not have control, the State must prove the (defendant’s) (1) control over the controlled substance and (2) knowledge that the controlled substance was within the (defendant’s) presence. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Law Office of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr
            In order to establish constructive possession of a controlled substance if the controlled substance is in a place over which the (defendant) does not have control, the State must prove the (defendant’s) (1) control over the controlled substance and (2) knowledge that the controlled substance was within the (defendant’s) presence. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:59 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Below the jump, find the transcript of my interview with Assistant Professor Jennifer Laurin from the UT law school, who spoke with Grits on Tuesday about prosecutorial oversight in anticipation of a panel discussion at 1:30 p.m. [read post]