Search for: "In Re Adoption of J"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 2,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
Guns and Ammo: Legally Storing, Moving, and Showing Them Off The laws surrounding firearms in Canada are not only complex but they also involve a variety of federal laws and provincial regulations. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
The clock resumed on March 5, 2004, when the murder charge was re-filed against Appellant. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:13 am
., 664 F.Supp. 2d 137 (D.Mass. 2009) (O’Toole, J.). [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 10:52 am
They're right. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
- (1) If at any time during the term of copyright in any Indian work which has been published or performed in public, a complaint is made to the Copyright Board that the owner of copyright in the work- (a) has refused to republish or allow the re-publication of the work or has refused to allow the performance in public of the work, and by reason of such refusal the work is withheld from the public; or (b) has refused to allow communication to the public by [broadcast], of… [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Gerald Godoy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 3:14 am
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:25 pm
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Katherine J. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
There are many factors that have contributed to increased expectations for corporations to adopt CSR programs as governments have changed the scope and thrust of their regulatory and ownership roles, and as regulatory governance principles that favor of market-based approaches have become more compelling for many states. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Senior IP Scholar Session Paul Goldstein, Stanford Law School A lot of the industry-specific provisions of copyright have no present justification and should be tossed (e.g., cable licensing); mature industry likes settled rules, but that’s not good enough. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
But they’re not identical, and the jurisprudence, despite Judge Ho’s contention, is not at all the same.Judge Ho notes that “Three circuits to date have construed Title VII to prohibit sexual orientation discrimination or transgender discrimination. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
This essay is not a normative argument in defense of deference, but rather an account of how the District Court in Texas boldly—and without discussion or acknowledgment—did away with such deference in ordering the Biden administration to re-start MPP, and how the Supreme Court, in refusing to stay the injunction, seemed not to mind. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against the order of Tugendhat J ([2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)) in JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
by Paul Bland, Claire Prestel, and Melanie Hirsch The consumer and civil rights communities are closely watching AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
In In Re: Biomet M2A Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2391 (N.D. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Yet, Kavanaugh's approach was adopted. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Cir. 2007) (en banc) (Rogers, J., dissenting).Occupational freedom. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 1:40 pm
J. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that this exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
