Search for: "Matter of Jones v Jones"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 2,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
The only decision of note was Kanter v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 1:30 pm
" Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law 37–38 (1997) (citing McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
A recent Mother Jones headline aptly summarizes one potential line of attack: “How Brett Kavanaugh Could Cripple the Next Democratic President. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:18 am
In his famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 2:28 am
" Jones, 565 U.S. at 416 (Sotomayor, J., concurring.). [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of… [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
Invalidity Bones and the Cancellation of the Crystal SkullSkullduggery Rum Ltd v Globefill Incorporated [2020] ETMR 9 EUIPO Cancellation Division (October 2019)Ignore my misleading title – this is nothing to do with Indiana Jones and, in a rare positive decision for a non-traditional mark, did not lead to the cancellation of Globefill’s EUTM for the 3D shape illustrated below. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm
Servs. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 5:01 am
Combs et al., 23-cv-10098; Jones v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
Jones & Laughlin, as well as the previous year’s Butler v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12] Wood v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm
The High Court of Australia also rejected arguments in favour of a “single publication” rule in the case of Dow Jones v Gutnick ([2002] HCA 56), holding that: “Harm to reputation is done when a defamatory publication is comprehended by the reader, the listener, or the observer. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 1:13 am
IndiaX v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
103 (2017), University of Chicago Law School, citing Hans v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
McInnes devotes an entire chapter to Hughes’ judicial role in the notorious case of Thatcher v Thatcher. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:43 am
On the first complaint, the facts of the case line up very closely with the Universal v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 6:25 am
” Debrey v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Paroline v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:11 am
Judge McAfee captioned his order as “State of Georgia v. [read post]
