Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 2521 - 2540 of 3,728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am by Erin Miller
Discussion of the Citizens United decision continues. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 10:05 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Keith of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm by NCC Staff
  The Supreme Court Didn’t Have to Rely on Xenophobic Logic By Leah Litman, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Leah Litman asserts that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
But bad as we may sincerely, even correctly, believe some of these decisions to be, they are still the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
This is the Iowa cerebral palsy resource guide; this guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:48 am
In affirming the district court's decision, the United States Supreme Court relied on the ‘collective entity‘ doctrine. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
 Among these states, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin expressly allow recovery of filial consortium damages pursuant to statute. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:37 am by Susan Brenner
Once in the United States, the . . . [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am by WIMS
As the two largest consumers and producers of energy, there can be no solution to this challenge without the efforts of both China and the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 1:09 pm by Orin Kerr
I think it’s pretty clear that the United States does not face a hardship if courts decline to rule on prospective Fourth Amendment questions when the United States applies for SCA court orders. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:44 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]