Search for: "New York v. New Jersey" Results 2521 - 2540 of 3,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2015, 12:32 pm
The brief is on behalf of Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE), and it can be found in full here; but here is the substance of the argument: SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, and cities such as Baltimore, New Orleans, Philadelphia, and Washington D.C., all ban the possession of stun guns. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Zimmer, Inc., 927 F.2d 124, 129 (2d Cir. 1991) (applying New York law); Phelps v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although it was no longer unanimous, five years later the Court reached the same conclusion with respect to a New Jersey anti-discrimination law in Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:13 am
Trial of Blogger Accused of Threatening 7th Circuit Judges Opens New York Law Journal Opening arguments took place Wednesday in the Brooklyn federal court trial of Hal Turner, the New Jersey blogger and Internet-radio talk-show host accused of threatening on his blog to assault and kill three 7th Circuit judges for their votes to uphold handgun bans. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
New York and New Jersey’s top rates kick in at even higher levels of marginal income: $1,077,550 and $5 million, respectively. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
New York and New Jersey’s top rates kick in at even higher levels of marginal income: $1,077,550 and $5 million, respectively. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Inѕtеаd, іt еnѕurеѕ thаt the tax authority gеtѕ fіrѕt tо сlаіm over оthеr creditors vуіng fоr thе іndіvіduаl’ѕ or buѕіnеѕѕ’ рrореrtу. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
By 1930 a total of thirty three states had enacted such laws although in three states – New Jersey in 1913, New York in 1918, and Indiana in 1921 – the laws were struck down as unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:09 pm
- Andrew Lavoott Bluestone on the New York Attorney Malpractice Blog Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument In Class Action Restriction Case - Philadelphia attorney Sean Wajert of Dechert LLP in his Mass Tort Defense 5 Great Legal Twitter Lists - Legal marketer Adrian Lurssen on JD Supra's JD Scoop What The Christie Election Means For Green Building In New Jersey - Philadelphia LEED AP Shari Shapiro on her Green… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(Yet another provision of PASPA gave New Jersey, by name and alone, the option going forward for a short period of time to support certain types of sports gambling. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 pm by Matthew Scarola
” At least some form of assault weapon is banned in California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:44 am by Gene Killian
  First, because the case was decided under New York law, the Court held that the carrier had “a duty to defend the entire action brought under any of the Policies, including the uncovered claims. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:09 pm by Sheppard Mullin
 Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants conspired to fix title insurance prices in New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio and New Jersey through participation in various title insurance rate-setting organizations in those states. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
Sinai catechism, on New York’s Upper East Side. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 2:23 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Rules from Bruen Further analysis of the material in this Part is in my article Restoring the right to bear arms: New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:00 am by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the District of New Jersey (King Pharmaceuticals Inc., King Pharmaceuticals Research and Development Inc., Pharmaceutical IP Holding Inc. v. [read post]