Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 2521 - 2540 of 6,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm by Giles Peaker
In the Article 8 defence English case law, the Supreme Court seemed pretty clear on the point, at least as a ‘general rule’, at para 61 of Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] 2 AC 104. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
Upholding the constitutional validity of the Act, and following State of A.P. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  A plaintiff whose PII, PFI, or PPI was stolen by hackers typically brings suit against the hacked company on his or her own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated people, hoping the presiding court will certify the proposed class and allow the case to proceed as a class action.[3]  Causes of action in customer cases run a wide gamut of legal theories, from traditional tort claims (negligence and fraud) to allegations of state and federal statutory violations (for… [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
”  []  Henry’s state law claims under the UTPA are, therefore preempted. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
As found by the Federal Court in  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
7, ECF No. 1-2.Levin was subsequently indicted on one count of possession of child pornography, 18 U.S. [read post]