Search for: "People v. Wills" Results 2521 - 2540 of 5,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2013, 7:58 am by Alfred Brophy
 Justice Harris' viciously proslavery opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:12 pm
  Such a mandate--or its equivalent--is an essential piece of any law that would prevent health insurers from rejecting insureds with pre-existing conditions: Without the mandate, people willing to forego routine health care (as many young, healthy people are), can wait until they need expensive care, and then sign up for health insurance. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:56 am by INFORRM
Even in AB v Bragg Communications, which was not influenced by the ECHR jurisprudence, courts at all levels were willing to countenance the plaintiff’s right to privacy in a defamation action. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:46 am by Brad Wendel
  I'll be interested to hear what people think about this case. [read post]
Military detention may be legitimate for those captured on an actual battlefield, as our supreme court recognised in Hamdi v Rumsfeld. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 8:26 am by Adam Levitin
Even if most are guilty, how much of an error rate are we willing to tolerate with the death penalty? [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am by Cory Doctorow
Below, we have set out examples of how DMCA 1201 -- and its Mexican equivalent -- is incompatible with human rights, including free expression, self-determination, the rights of people with disabilities, cybersecurity, education, and archiving; as well as the law's consequences for Mexico's national resiliency and economic competitiveness and food- and health-security. [read post]