Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 2521 - 2540 of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
Adam Cohen of Time previews United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:59 pm
Olson then turned to his main argument, saying that Microsoft did not supply components from the United States because the software actually installed on the computers was copied overseas. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as  licensing Roberts v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 5:31 am by Josh Blackman
[The primary effect, if not purpose, of international law, is to use lawfare to punish Israel, and by extension, the United States.] [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am by Aaron Pelley
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-10876.pdf Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals United States v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:29 am by Kali Borkoski
The Court also invited the Acting Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Ryan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 11:49 am by Rory Little
United States, previewed here, it seems that the only question is how broadly the Court will rule in Rosemond’s favor. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:14 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Justices of the Supreme Court will meet soon to offer preliminary votes in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:14 am by SHG
United States, but the case is all about Amy. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:32 am by Kevin Johnson
United States, in which the Supreme Court, in a 2015 opinion by Scalia, found that the Armed Career Criminal Act’s similarly worded definition of “violent felony” was so vague as to violate the due process clause. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:22 am by Bill Otis
  The theory that brought about this result became an instant icon, of sorts, with the defense bar, and was even noted by Justice Scalia years later in the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Nicole Huberfeld
  So, waiting for CMS to act, as the United States has urged, is futile, and states would be free from enforcement, public or private, judicial or executive. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:27 am by Rachel Sachs
At the Huffington Post, Scottie Thomaston has coverage of an amicus brief filed recently by Indiana and fourteen other states in Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]