Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 5,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:40 am
[The contestant, bears the initial burden of proof]. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:52 pm
Williams-Sonoma states that it sells its goods in its Pottery Barn stores nationwide, but does not address the extent of use of its MANHATTAN branded goods. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
As Oliver LJ pointed out at p 464, Lord Diplock in Erven Warnink at p 744 stated that a plaintiff must have “used the descriptive term long enough on the market in connection with his own goods and have traded successfully enough to have built up a goodwill for his business”, and, as Oliver LJ then observed, this “emphasises the point that goodwill (as opposed to mere reputation) does not exist here apart from a business carried on here”. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:39 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm
" United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681, 684-85 (7th Cir. 2010). [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:11 am
In R v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:11 pm
Allegations of off-label use and promotion have no bearing on design. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
… Rights…could be restricted by law to promote the good of the society. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
Times v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
Creech (1993)), let States limit the uses juries make of mitigation (Graham v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm
He remained in that position until April 2019, when he resigned in good standing. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:49 am
As the Court recently held in People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
A couple of aspects of the majority opinion bear note. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
Several professors caught up in the controversy I have outlined have stated that, going forward, in light of protest, they will no longer vocalize "nigger. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
” In any other year, King v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
There is no stated necessity that the need or the risk be significant or substantial. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 1:16 am
The book bears that stamp, as Judge Meyer was ably joined by Burton C. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:08 am
Hobbs v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:55 am
[Now, that's good news!] [read post]
