Search for: "The Good Business Corp."
Results 2521 - 2540
of 4,716
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Litella's catchphrase when I read the Appellate Division, Second Department's important decision last week affirming the trial court's key stock valuation rulings, in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 2010 NY Slip Op 04794 (2d Dept June 1, 2010). [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:52 pm
Target Corp. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
" ExxonMobil Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
Since Quill was decided, in 1992, the substantial increase in electronic commerce has changed how goods and services are provided. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
Star Asia U.S.A., LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) 8th Circuit: ‘Use in commerce’ under trademark law requires sale or transport of goods; mere press releases not enough: Sensient Technologies Corp v SensoryEfffects Flavor Co (IP Spotlight) TTAB affirms refusal of ‘Closure Cap Configuration Mark’ on functionality and nondistinctiveness grounds (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:06 pm
If you recall the Blues Brothers song, Rubber Biscuit, it provides a good description of a SPAC in its musical explanation of a Wish Sandwich. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:28 pm
Netscape Comm'ns Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d cir. 2002). [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
One "practical effect" of all these state schemes is the cost—legal cost, compliance cost, and more—that the firms incur to conform their business practices to the different state laws where they do business. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:31 am
Md. 1998); Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 9:58 am
However, loans to private business enterprises under 50 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:28 pm
Lending Corp. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:33 pm
None of this seems unusual or unexpected to anyone who's been in the banking business for more than ten minutes. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
Accordingly, in the structural context there is sufficiently good reason to be skeptical of incumbent’s claims to be acting in the shareholders’ best interests to justify a more intrusive standard of review than the business judgment rule. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:17 pm
I don’t think so, and the discussion of the issue of an infringer’s bad faith in NXVIM Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 671 A.2d 1151, 1155 (Pa. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGP). [read post]
2 May 2019, 12:31 pm
A bank does not sell goods or services. [read post]
