Search for: "US Inventor"
Results 2521 - 2540
of 7,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2025, 8:26 am
The Overeager Inventor: Filing Too Soon At the other end of the spectrum was an inventor convinced his product would be a global success. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
The general rule in US patent cases is that an employer can construct an employment agreement that automatically conveys title to inventions and a right-to-patent from the inventor to the employer using certain “hereby assigns” language. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 1:39 pm
The first attorney was adamant that I read the document and comment on it, but I could not edit 25 pages of cryptic, badly written run-on sentences used in long paragraphs that spanned pages. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
In 2017, the Supreme Court ruled that the doctrine of laches cannot be used as a defense to bar damages claims for patent infringement that are brought within the 6-year statutory limitations period under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
Despite the several exemplary scenarios provided by the Guidance, there still seems to be room for interpretation as to whether the inventor of a specific AI model can qualify as the inventor of the output produced by that model.Plant Varieties Jocelyn Bosse reported on the decision of the Court of Bari (Specialised Business Section). [read post]
30 May 2019, 2:02 pm
But it is clear that testing need notbe conducted by the inventor. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:40 am
Another bad bill, the “Inventor Rights Act,” would have created a special class of patents deemed by the government to be “inventor-owned,” then given them special privileges that make it easier to sue people and more harmful when they do. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:12 am
If Nuvo seeks review of this decision at the Supreme Court, it might challenge the Federal Circuit’s finding that the specification described the invention in so many words, enabled those skilled in the art to make and use it, but somehow still failed to satisfy the statue: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled… [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 12:09 pm
I divided up cited references into three broad categories: Top) Non-Patent Literature; Mid) US Patent Application Publications; and Low) All other US & Foreign Patent Documents. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 11:45 pm
US applications 61/035 540 and 61/035 777 were filed jointly by three persons, who happen to be the inventors mentioned in relation to present application. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
But, perhaps more importantly, try to use personal radar to determine whether you can trust those to whom you have made disclosures. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
Here, the defendant argued that the inventor did not enable the full scope of the claimed invention in that the inventor did not describe a way of achieving large changes of resistance over and above what the inventor was able to achieve, namely, 11.8%. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:58 am
Certain types of rejections can be overcome by “swearing behind” the prior art used in the rejection. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:42 am
Differences in the method of use will only come into play if you are claiming a new and nonobvious method of using, which is typically not the case. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:16 am
If the patent is granted, the inventor is granted exclusive legal domain over the use of the patent for a limited amount of time. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:24 pm
The changes regarding the "first inventor-to-file" will take effect on March 16, 2013. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:07 am
There are varied forms of radiation therapy used. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 7:10 am
” US Inventors’ goal is to protect independent inventors and innovative small businesses and startups through legislation and administrative changes. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 am
The following is a little piece by the IPKat's valued friend and colleague, European patent attorney Kevin Cordina (Olswang LLP), who writes: "In Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Incorporated a US priority application was filed in the name of three inventors, with the rights from one of those inventors passing to Cook. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 7:11 am
Before that the only way you could file was using a non-provisional patent. [read post]
