Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 2541 - 2560 of 8,633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2018, 7:20 am by Michael S. Levine
 According the Ahmad, the ruling is likely to carry strong precedential effect due to the solid reasoning of the court’s decision, which is premised on the Delaware Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Whalen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am by Barry Sookman
The CRTC has the relevant powers of a court of superior jurisdiction and already makes decisions that affect the fundamental freedoms of Canadians. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am by Ad Law Defense
  It filed a petition in Superior Court in Fresno County seeking injunctive and declaratory relief to enjoin OEHHA from listing glyphosate as a Prop 65 chemical. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:00 am by Sara Josselyn
Following the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada in Evans v Teamsters, Local 31, 2008 SCC 20, the Court determined that an obligation to mitigate does not include an obligation to work in an atmosphere of hostility or embarrassment. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s… [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:38 pm by Daniel Nazer
This test, from a California Supreme Court case called Comedy III Productions v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court unanimously held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1026; Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:03 pm by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
The First District Court of Appeal then added further gloss when it interpreted UPA in the case of Jewel v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am by David Post
" And third, we now know exactly what the Agreement said, because Daniels has put it into the public record, appending it to a Complaint she recently filed in CA Superior Court seeking a declaration that the Agreement is invalid and unenforceable [more on this suit below]. [read post]