Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 2541 - 2560 of 28,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2023, 1:28 am by Rose Hughes
However, the EPO applies the same gold standard to disclaimers as it does to any other type of feature. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 7:31 pm by vforberger
As a result, this latest dip in the ratio does NOT represent an actual decline in initial claims in 2020. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm by admin
For a comparison between Form 8938 and the FBAR, click here. 1. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by Giles Peaker
As set out above, unfitness does not have an HHSRS Category 1 or Category 2 assessment. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:43 am by Sarah Wronsky and Lawrence Block
For example, FLSA-covered workers who perform support work “in connection with a contract” for less than 20 percent of their hours in a workweek are not entitled to the increased minimum wage. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:44 am
Mason"The 20-year term established by the Legislature for New Jersey judgments can be extended for an additional 20-year term, provided the creditor files a timely motion to revive and satisfies the Kronstadt elements. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
  The reduction of salary and retainer to $1 does not address performance based compensation such as stock options. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:31 am
Plaintiffs are unaware of the true names and capacities of those defendants sued herein as DOES 1-20. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
These decisions deal with withdrawals from a withdrawal of an application.J 1/11In J 1/11, the application under consideration was filed as an international application and then entered the European phase. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:31 am by Jon Sands
He had already served 20 months. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:36 am by Jon Sands
Mayea-Pulido, No. 18-50223 (1-3-20)(Friedland w/M. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:37 am by Jon Sands
Collazo, No. 15-50509 (12-2-20)(en banc). [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 2:24 pm
However one interprets Opinion 1/09 of the CJEU, it is pretty clear that the UPC Agreement requires UPC participating states to respect the primary of EU law (Articles 20/24) and the overarching jurisdiction of the CJEU (Article 33) in relation to the UPC system. [read post]