Search for: "Does 1 - 38" Results 2541 - 2560 of 4,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Court addressed the following four issues: (1) Is the question of whether the Prime Minister’s advice to the Queen was lawful justiciable in a court of law? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:07 pm
(3) Data retention remains doubtful in terms of fundamental rights compliance: in the ECHR, S & Marper v UK questions mass monitoring of the unconvicted, Copland v UK reiterates that traffic data is covered by Article 8 (as I argue here); the German courts are considering various challenges (summarised by Digital Rights Ireland: 1 | 2), and DRI itself is engaged in a challenge to the Directive. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am by Nathaniel Sobel
Act does not infringe on Americans’ First Amendment rights or prohibit their right to engage in boycotts .... [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
”  References Third Circuit's prediction in Berrier but does not decide issue.).Beard v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 12:34 am
The making available and management of an online sharing platform must be therefore considered an act of communication for the purposes of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
And the U.S. public does not believe Russia’s interests are similar to America’s interests. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
The ribbon is the #1 reason why, I “Mr. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
In reference to Companies Act 2013, he does not become ineligible to be appointed as a director. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am by Dáire McCormack-George
Perhaps the cornerstone of EU regulation of education and training is the European Qualifications Framework (‘EQF’), a reference framework for qualifications which ‘serves as a translation device between different qualifications systems and their levels’.[3] It does so by ranking qualifications obtained at every stage of education according to eight levels, based on their learning outcomes. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:36 pm
Roed deposes that she has suffered a loss of income but does not quantify it. [40] There are other factors that were found significant in  Muscutt that are missing in this case: 1. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:30 am by Adam Gillette
  You know, because Justice Scalia does not care about legislative history--or something like that. [read post]