Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 5,732
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2015, 12:28 pm
In Moncrieffe v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
The trial judge stated that he did “not find that there is sufficient originality or skill and judgment to justify copyright subsisting in mere five-digit numerical codes and/or the functional descriptions of the denturist services associated with those codes. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
And, because a lesser degree of similarity is required when a trademark holder’s mark is strong, the commercial strength of the “POM” mark amplifies the significance of the marks’ many similarities See Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., 506F.3d 1165, 1174 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[T]he fact that the similarity involves the use of a much stronger mark would make that similarity weigh more heavily in the analysis of this factor. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 9:08 pm
Category: Infringement By: Christian Hannon, Contributor TitleAzure Networks v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:50 am
He was sentenced to 1.5 years and she got 6 months. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
In Decon Group, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Supreme Court last week denied Certiorari to the state of Arizona in the case called Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:33 pm
Herring v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
So, if the owner of an earlier registered mark wanted to stop the use of the later registered mark, he would first have to seek its invalidation (even though invalidity and infringement actions could be incorporated within the same proceedings since 1986). [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 6:05 pm
In Feresi v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
Malibu Media v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 5:32 am
In People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently granted review in Walker v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:14 am
Minassian v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV, at 17; Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma at 18-19). [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 10:29 pm
SeeAmgen Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:46 am
See, e.g., FDIC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade U.S. [read post]
