Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 2541 - 2560 of 6,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2016, 8:12 am by Amy Davis
Note: Attorney Davis originally wrote this post as a contributor for SCOV Law. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:25 pm by Jeff Redding
I’ve been thinking a lot about Kim Davis and Kentucky recently, in conjunction with a piece I’ve been writing for a special issue of the Saint Louis University Law Journal dedicated to our annual Childress Lecture event; this year’s keynote was given by Texas Law’s Larry Sager and concerned “Religious Freedom, Social Justice and Public Policy. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on the same day Lord Thomas CJ and Nicola Davies J gave judgment on remedy in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast Publications Ltd. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Perhaps unsurprisingly, a federal court sent his hostile work environment claim under Title VII to trial (Davis v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 12:58 pm by Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP
  This sparked some dissenting jurisdictions to enact religious freedom laws, and it also resulted in the Kim Davis controversy. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am by Lawfare Staff
” Australia applauded the FON patrol and said that the U.S. was simply upholding international law. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:22 am
Dickey, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Derivative suits, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:40 am by Orin Kerr
Davis left the state of the law quite uncertain, giving this case the potential to be a major decision. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:09 pm by Orin Kerr
This is the Court’s first exclusionary rule case since Davis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 10:24 am by Beth Graham
  Next, the Original Partnerships signed an agreement with a San Antonio-based law firm, Davis, Cedillo & Mendoza, Inc. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:45 am by Lorene Park
Perhaps unsurprisingly, a federal court sent his hostile work environment claim under Title VII to trial (Davis v. [read post]