Search for: "LEE v LEE" Results 2541 - 2560 of 7,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2021, 6:55 am by David Oscar Markus
Supreme Court decision that outlaws “reverse discrimination,” Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This evidence convinces the Court of Appeals (Parker, Lee and Park) that defendants were not discriminating against anyone. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 11:46 am by Stevie Phillips
By Stevie PhillipsOn January 23, Justice Lee authored a unanimous Tennessee Supreme Court opinion in Stanton v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The developers lose the case, not because the Village did not demonstrate anti-Jewish animus, but on more mundane procedural grounds.The case is BMG Monroe LLC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 1:25 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the police entered the plaintiff's home without a warrant, commencing a years-long legal dispute that culminates in the Court of Appeals ruling this case must stand trial.The case is Calhoun v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Among the recipients were Sophia Lee, Serena Mayeri, and Herbert Hovenkamp. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Dave Maass
"Section 230 gives website operators the certainty that they can offer platforms for user speech without the risk of spending every day litigating over comment sections," ACLU Staff Attorney Lee Rowland said. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says plaintiff has a case.The case is Sierra v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The officer appealed, and the Court of Appeals sends the case back to trial on this issue.The issue is Jok v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:13 pm by Michael W. Huseman
   Lee v Tam Amicus Brief by Mike Huseman on Scribd [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm by Jeff Kosseff
., and Mike Lee, R-Utah, introduced a bill that would require warrants for all email, regardless of how long it has been stored. [read post]