Search for: "Labelle v. State"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 8,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2012, 10:37 am
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged about Turkish Coalition of America, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:49 pm
Warner Brothers internally labels films As, Bs and Cs. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:47 am
The court labels this argument frivolous, saying “U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:19 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the much-anticipated Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:17 am
Hammer v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
The Rothman brief does make the salutary point that labeling a study outcome as not “statistically significant” carries the danger that the study’s data have no value, or that the study may be taken to reject the hypothesized association. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
”MTM’s appeal rested on two grounds: The likelihood of confusionThe court first had regard for the labelling of the watches on Amazon’s website given the observation in Network Automation v Advanced System Concepts (available here) that, when dealing with internet commerce, while a likelihood of confusion could be shown where “consumers saw banner advertisements that were ‘confusingly labelled or not labelled at… [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
That Pom wins and the labeling is enjoined? [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:55 am
The FDCA lacks any general savings clause like the critical language in Rose (except in the food-labeling context mentioned above). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
McDaniel v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:32 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled Monday in Concepcion v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:30 pm
In Turner v Rogers, the Court began from a premise it regarded as both legally significant and unquestionably true: that child support proceedings are civil. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:30 am
Cox v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
You can now state openly what you though all along - that it's safe and effective to cure Alzheimers. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:08 am
`[D]uring the time I pled guilty,’ Vaskas stated, `I asked about the [second] report. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 2:40 pm
In Schroer v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 7:24 am
In Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
I assigned a “not known” label when I could not be reasonably sure of a current or former party affiliation. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
Is King v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
The opinion we are cheddaring about today, Drake v. [read post]
