Search for: "MATTER OF T H" Results 2541 - 2560 of 6,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2017, 5:24 am
 As Italy also expressly includes works of architecture among protectable subject-matter, it is the perfect candidate to see how those who would be harmed by the introduction of a specific exception allowing freedom of panorama would react to the introduction of a specific exception. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 3:26 am
In re Simon Family Wines, LLC, Serial No. 97608809 (August 20, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 10:37 am by Jacquelyn Greene
If the case involves offenses allegedly committed at age 16 or 17 and the most serious charge is a Class H or Class I felony, the entire case falls under the jurisdiction of the superior court on transfer of the Class H or Class I felony. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 4:28 pm by Amy Howe
A 2004 change to Section 202(h) also left the “public interest” language unchanged. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:57 am by SHG
The Hearing Officer held that it didn’t matter what Braasch said or did, but was entirely up to the Yale cops to characterize their response in whatever way they deemed best. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:25 pm by Larry Tolchinsky
 However, this only applies to certain foreclosures: the limitations deadline of 12 months applies to Florida foreclosure judgments involving real estate defined as 1-family to 4-family dwelling units; and it only applies to any deficiency actions from July 1, 2013 forward — doesn’t matter when the foreclosure claim began. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 6:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
[h]e commits any unlawful act in retaliation for anything done by another in his [or her] capacity as witness or informant.... [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  If so, why didn’t you stay and fight rather than getting out? [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:58 am by Florian Mueller
Goldstein overlooks are three inconvenient facts, any single one of which makes his statement less than truthful:In the first Federal Circuit appeal (the one that resulted in a copyrightability holding and a remand of "fair use" for retrial), Oracle clearly argued that the fair use question should be resolved by the judges and not be put before a jury.On remand, Oracle simply wasn't allowed by Judge William H. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Most patents and © don’t have value. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Andy Mergendahl
Good intentions don’t matter. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 7:59 am
Under Chief Justice Roberts' opinion, what matters under the constitutional law is how the thing operates in reality, not what you call it. [read post]