Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE" Results 2541 - 2560 of 4,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 10:39 am by Dave_Fagundes
  Could it be that the folks who created the Near v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm by Conrad B. Wilton
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. stated in a footnote that bad faith should not be a central factor in the fair use analysis. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:40 am
This would make it different from "a literary, pictorial, cinematographic or musical work, which is a precise and objective form of expression". [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:33 am by Josh H. Escovedo
The Lanham Act is protective of all trademarks that a proponent can establish having used in the United States, whether registered or not. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:33 am by Josh H. Escovedo
The Lanham Act is protective of all trademarks that a proponent can establish having used in the United States, whether registered or not. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am by Gordon Firemark
Currently, radio stations pay songwriters for the music they play but don’t have to pay the bands who recorded the material. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Bloomberg L.P., No. 1:23-cv-09152 (S.D.N.Y. filed Oct 17, 2023); Concord Music Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  In his mind, she’s using the music as originally intended; her children are interacting w/ the music. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright The Evan Law blog has an article summarising Finley v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Court, SD New… https://t.co/t4iIshKpdx 2020-03-12 RCMP issues dire warning about its ability to police terrorism, foreign interference and cybercrime https://t.co/FCvZ1c0GWP 2020-03-12 UK Government’s Advisory Committee Publishes Report on Public Sector Use of AI | Covington Digital Health https://t.co/f93MFYIPST 2020-03-12 Senate IP Subcommittee Examines Foreign Approaches to Digital Piracy in Second Hearing on US … https://t.co/Ys9cxMKG69 2020-03-12 Breaking the rhetorical… [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am by Marie Louise
Echostar en banc decision stands (Patently-O) (IPBiz) CAFC confirms Odom’s patent invalid: Gary Odom v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
  The panel provided a brief reminder of the key UK and CJEU cases dealing with the meaning of (1) an act of “communication” and (2) a “public”, both in the context of re-transmission of broadcast signals (SGAE v Rafael Hotels Case C-306/05, SCF v Marco Del Corso Case C-135/10, ITV v TV Catchup Case C-607/11 and Reha Training v GEMA Case C-117/5) and P2P networks (Polydor v… [read post]