Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 2541 - 2560 of 8,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm
Last year was the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Standard Oil Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 7:25 am by Bart van Wezenbeek (Hoffmann Eitle)
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Guide to EU and UK Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law, Eighth Edition by Sally Shorthose€ 265 The Digital Economy and International Trade: Transnational Data Flows… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:13 am
Title VII does not bar the selection of an individual because of the individual’s personal relationship with the appointing authorityFella v County of Rockland, 297 A.D.2d 813According to the court's decision, the Rockland County Director of Employee Rights and Equity Compliance concluded that Rockland County Commissioner of Hospitals Peter T. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The first, Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201) and the second, Bunt v Tilley ([2006] EWHC 407 (QB)) involved the liability of ISPs, the third Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. ([2009] EWHC 1765 (QB)), the liability of Google for results generated by its search engine. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Peters via Justice Baldwin — Zvi Rosen points to a number of documents he has recently made online, including an “abstract of the argument” from plaintiff in Wheaton v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 10:46 am
WSJ Law Blog: "Rocker Threatens To Sue": "Jon Bon Jovi â€â [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 9:20 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The L.C. v M.A.J. case which recently came down from the Appellate court offers some perspective on the realities of the law in New Jersey. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 9:20 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The L.C. v M.A.J. case which recently came down from the Appellate court offers some perspective on the realities of the law in New Jersey. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 9:01 am by INFORRM
Regional Employment Judge Peter Hildebrand rejected the applications, saying that Rule 50 in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 did not give discretion to decide that judgments should not be published. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 3:50 am by Bart van Wezenbeek (Hoffmann Eitle)
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Guide to EU and UK Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law, Eighth Edition by Sally Shorthose€ 265 The Digital Economy and International Trade: Transnational Data Flows… [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 6:27 am
For more information about the Liss decision or how it might affect you or your business, please contact Peter Cavanaugh. [read post]