Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 3,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:24 am
Where Kavanaugh and Gorsuch parted company with the majority was in their preference for applying the “demonstrated, specific need” standard of United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Case v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:28 am
Bantam Books v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
United States, 135 S. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
” The program built upon our conclusions, outlined in an essay that we published in the fall [German Version] [English Version], about the fundamental nature of the differences between Germany and the United States with respect to the way our countries seek to balance security and liberty. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It is also ultra vires under well-established law.The seminal case applying the municipal cost recovery rule (sometimes also called the "free public services doctrine") is a sixty-year old Supreme Court case called United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 11:19 am
He also wrote the majority opinion in 1869 in Pacific Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:55 am
Unit B 1981). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
Another co-panelist—Shoshana Weissmann of the R Street Institute—also has a terrific series of blog posts on this particular issue. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:33 am
The first sentence of § 1983 reads as follows: Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects . . . any citizen of the United States . . . to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
In Vance v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, November 13, 2019 Tags: Capital markets, Institutional Investors, IPOs, Long-Term value, Private firms, Public firms, Retail investors 2020 Policy Guidelines—United States Posted by Courteney Keatinge and Kern McPherson, Glass, Lewis & Co., on Wednesday, November 13, 2019 Tags: Audit committee, Board performance, Boards of… [read post]
