Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 2541 - 2560 of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
The district court denied all of those motions.U.S. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(I:2) Taft’s first court packing did not work out entirely as planned. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 10:20 am by Florian Mueller
Against that backdrop, the Munich court's stance on the prematurity of such motions to dismiss is even easier to understand.In other Ericsson v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 5:35 pm by Paul Singer and Beth Chun
On August 16 the First District Court of Appeals reversed and remanded. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:12 pm by Ellena Erskine
Eleven states brought the first challenge in March of this year. [read post]
Thus there has been actual state judicial practice establishing “attempts” as part of piracy; the Court didn’t just read this off a treaty that had never been applied in any case. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm by Eric W. Orts
The first instance of the Court’s misfiring came in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
A state district court judge, dismissing criminal charges against Defendant, ruled that Defendant acted “within his rights. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
Subsequently, the government filed a Motion for Judicial Inquiry, seeking the district court's guidance on how to proceed.The district court held a two-hour hearing on the matter, during which it thoroughly explored the issues with Gott's and the government's counsel and questioned Gott. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:20 am by Dave Maass
While the case was unsuccessful at the district and appeals court levels, EFF believes the issue is of such significance that it merits review by the highest court. [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:56 pm by Margaret Taylor
District Court for the District of Columbia in Trump v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]