Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 2541 - 2560 of 9,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2019, 10:29 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal originally ruled that unilateral arbitration provisions are unenforceable because they lack mutual consideration. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Steve Vladeck
Instead, it points to the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Lewis did not state any errors from the District Court ruling, but due to his pro se status, the Court used its discretion from Putman v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:22 am by Joy Waltemath
In addition, said the court, failing to apply the rule here could result in inconsistent judgments from two federal district courts and would frustrate the legitimate aim of preserving judicial economy. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 7:43 am by Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP
The First Circuit held that any heightened requirements for these processes under state law would have to come from the state legislature or the state courts. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:48 am by SHG
But the First Circuit previously held in a 2018 case with the same name, Doe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Illinois Supreme Court addressed this issue in its January 25, 2019 decision in the Rosenbach v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
A three-fold test for “material considerations” is found in Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578 (“Newbury”). [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 7:53 am by INFORRM
Decisions this Week United StatesSpeech First, INC. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:34 am by Cristina Mariottini
At the same time, the District Court of Sofia referred to the President of the District Court of Sofia for the commencement of separate proceedings. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
But "[u]nder the Erie doctrine, federal courts sitting in diversity apply state substantive law and federal procedural law," Gasperini v. [read post]