Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 2541 - 2560 of 5,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
He further testified that he felt with the SCS, Hedges “has a very good chance of having significant improvement in his quality of life. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
But any decision to hold back evidence must bear in mind the court’s function and authority at the initial hearing of the petition to make a summary determination on the merits to the extent no triable issues of fact are raised. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
In the absence of actual harm, privacy cases are hardly worth pursuing http://t.co/6RYcmFS01Q -> United States: Nudity, Privacy and the Prostitute – Susan Brenner http://t.co/8r3oTanQVT -> Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson http://t.co/qHm27iucpC -> Web Site Accessibility Standards in Ontario http://t.co/5GkvGyebgZ -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2015-05-23: Computer and… [read post]
30 May 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
While it’s been difficult to wait for the past eight months, we are now confident that the trial of the United States of America v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
What fascinates me is how the plaintiff's credibility was ripped apart at trial but he still won the case.The case is Wiercinski v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
 As Newman J wrote in her dissenting opinion "validity and infringement are distinct issues, bearing different burdens, different presumptions, and different evidence. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm by familoo
And indeed, what is now the complainants coercive control WAS once their very own tolerable if not ideal state of existence. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:58 am by Joy Waltemath
In 2013, the employee filed a civil action alleging violations of the FLSA and state law. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
As Oliver LJ pointed out at p 464, Lord Diplock in Erven Warnink at p 744 stated that a plaintiff must have “used the descriptive term long enough on the market in connection with his own goods and have traded successfully enough to have built up a goodwill for his business”, and, as Oliver LJ then observed, this “emphasises the point that goodwill (as opposed to mere reputation) does not exist here apart from a business carried on here”. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:47 am by Larry
Do you remember the tale of Customs Fraud Investigations, LLC v. [read post]