Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 2541 - 2560
of 51,472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2023, 9:05 am
AB 1307 is aimed at correcting to some extent problems with CEQA that were highlighted by the recent appellate decision in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:58 am
The Threat to Agency Enforcement Power A second case, SEC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Rivkin is counsel of record in Moore v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am
Conceptually non-material damages are not limited to emotional and psychological harm (see, inter alia, recital 75 GDPR) and any negative consequence (see also para. 50 of the ECJ judgment) may be compensated, as long as the damage is proven. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:59 pm
See Cygnus Opportunity Fund, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm
Flora et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
“The administration’s request to suspend the long-established state constitutional right that protects our clients from the elements is not who we are as a city,” the groups said. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 12:41 pm
Abstract below: This review explains how and why the United States has systemically high poverty. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 9:08 am
United States…. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 6:52 am
See Backpage.com v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
US has a long history of state lawmakers silencing elected Black officials (Times-Union). [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
One notable case is Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 6:31 am
In Smith v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 6:31 am
In Smith v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Take New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
Supreme Court clarified this standard in Groff v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
For example, section 501(c)(3) organizations are allowed to lobby so long as lobbying activity is not a substantial part of their activities. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am
This argument has never been tested by the UK or EU courts, instead only arising when there is an underlying disability that prevents carrying a pregnancy (Murphy v Slough Borough Council [2005] ICR 721; Case C-167/12 CD v ST [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:169; Case C-363/12 Z v A (Re Equal Treatment) ECLI:EU:C:2014:159). [read post]
