Search for: "TAYLOR v. TAYLOR" Results 2541 - 2560 of 4,257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am by INFORRM
– Brian Cathcart Defamation Act 2013: The public interest defence and digital communications – Jacob Rowbottom Case Law: Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing, Subject access requests: Court of Appeal bolsters right to disclosure of data – Ashley Hurst and Peter Barratt Seamus Milne and the ‘Mystery Blonde’: Five years after Leveson the press still ignores privacy – Hugh Tomlinson QC How Dacre and the Mail are making the case for section 40 – Brian… [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:55 am
Mandatory subjects of negotiationsCarmel PBA v PERB, 267 AD2d 858 The Carmel PBA case involves a “legal interpretation” made by the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
A school board waiver of its right to dismiss a probationary school administrator at any time during the probationary term must be explicitly statedConsedine v Portville Cent. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 12:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Taylor, 694 F.3d 650, 655 (6th Cir.2012) (explaining that the service requirement is satisfiedby proper service of process, consent, waiver, or forfeitureby the defendant (first citing Murphy Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-8777, Taylor v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
Co. v Beau Rivage Rest., supra at 102; see also McKie v Taylor, 146 AD2d 921 [1989]).'[Id.]. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The same sex crimes was not charged in more than one of the counts (see People v Saunders, 290 AD2d 461 [2002]; People v Taylor, 190 Misc 2d 124 [2002]). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
Telford Taylor, the chief NMT prosecutor, came to think of the trial program as a failure. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 2:55 pm
  It convinced the trial court (Judge Taylor, down here in San Diego, who's very bright but also definitely a stickler for details), after all. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
Class 46 blogger and Taylor Wessing associate Christian Tenkhoff provides an analysis of Case T-106/14 Universal Utility International GmbH & Co.KG v OHIM, in which the General Court of the European Union ('GC') tackled registrability of the word mark GREENWORLD.* Spain: Did the “Google Tax” really change the market? [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]