Search for: "Three S Consulting v. US" Results 2541 - 2560 of 5,357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 12:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is all the more true considering the Supreme Court's decision in NIFLA v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 12:24 am
Ford's notes show that the Scruggs Katrina Group was interested in hiring him as a consultant as well as using him as a fact witness. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
 Well, first, the standard — enunciated for the first time in DC Comics v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Hungary, Benelux stewed by Europe’s finest – ‘genuine use’ of a CTM (IPKat) (IPKat) Can anything be more ground-breaking, earth-shattering and paradigm-shifting? [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm by Jack Pringle
And because both the UAA and the FAA use the term “shall”, confirmation is mandatory.Addressing Dealer’s mootness argument, Justice Beatty reasoned that “[c]onfirmation of an award is a distinguishable issue from a defendant’s payment or satisfaction of an award. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 11:32 am by Mack Sperling
The Business Court has given the same interpretation to Rule 30(e) at least three times, in BB&T Boli Plan Tr. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Divisional Court recently released a decision in Greenpeace Canada v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Update: It is interesting to contrast the Court’s willingness to give Congress more time to reconsider the Voting Rights Act in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
13 May 2017, 10:22 am by Schachtman
The case, which has gained this recent notoriety is Lois Slemp v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
  Id. at 353-54.That brings us to Bates v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:05 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Notice of dispute must be in writing and given within 15 working days of the receipt of the Consultants findings. [read post]