Search for: "Unknown Persons Having Interests" Results 2541 - 2560 of 3,881
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2013, 3:55 am by Peter Mahler
Here’s how the new provision read: Except as set forth in this Agreement, no Member shall gift, sell, exchange or otherwise transfer to another person any portion of a Membership Interest. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 This case was not an action that fit within the provision of CCP §39 “[f]or the recovery of real property, or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form, of that right or interest, and for injuries to real property” or “[f]or the foreclosure of all liens and mortgages on real property. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:23 am by Steven Gursten
In the first 10 years, we disliked each other for some unknown reason. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
I, too, can admire the good work they have done. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
I, too, can admire the good work they have done. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:05 am by Monika Kuschewsky
The fact that “their character as personal data would remain ‘unknown’ to internet search engine service provider[s]” or that “the presence of personal data in the source web pages is in a certain sense random” would not change this conclusion. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:41 am by Ron Coleman
Now this is really interesting on several levels. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
My answers were based on my personal experience in the legal publishing industry. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:36 pm by Jason Rantanen
That report concluded that it would be difficult, on any rational basis, to confine reform to genetic materials and technologies, and that the extension of the reform to other fields – where the patenting of pure and isolated chemicals that occur in nature was uncontroversial – could have unknown consequences. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:12 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
The exclusion in 2005 was $11,000 per person, meaning that Kraft could have handed out gifts worth $11,000 or less to any number of individuals without ever being subject to gift tax. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court has weighed the genuine personal interests at stake here; these are questions affecting the lives of three young children and the adults who claim to love them. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:22 am by Cathy
In fact, part of the reason this ride was such a challenge was because it involved plunging myself into so much unknown. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  It is hardly apparent that a DNA test (which involves a gentle swab of a person’s cheek) intrudes more on personal privacy than a strip search in which people have to “remove their clothing and expose the most private areas of their bodies to close visual inspection as a routine part of the intake process. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:28 pm
One claim of particular interest in the Burgeses’ lawsuit is that for premises liability against the hotel. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
We have only the order itself, not the application that underlies it, but I have a hard time imagining the application that could have produced it. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
  For many exposures and conditions of interest, epidemiologic studies have evolved to accommodate the relevant model of risk distribution. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:49 am by Melissa Wojtylak
We haven’t written much about res ipsa loquitur on the blog, and today’s case doesn’t really qualify as a drug or device case per se, but it’s an interesting opinion and we thought it was worth sharing. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:06 pm by Howard Knopf
In the USA, they have hooked dead grandmothers, 12 year old children, and countless truly “innocent” victims – either through outright mistake, stale records, or loose use of a Wi-Fi router by persons unknown, such as neighbours of friends of teenage children or whatever. [read post]