Search for: "WEEKLY v. STATE"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 3,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Adaddy@ during weekly supervised visits, and that they were affectionate with each other In Matter of Luis V v Laisha PT, 184 A.D.3d 648, 125 N.Y.S.3d 133 (2d Dept.,2020) in 2017 the petitioner, filed a petition for a declaration that he was the father of the child, who was born in 2016, and an order for genetic testing. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
United States Ryan Larson, the man c [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:32 am
John B. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:32 am
John B. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:32 am
John B. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:53 am
Erie Insurance Exchange may contact me at dancummins@comcast.net.As stated, I do not have the Veltri v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 4:04 pm
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:16 pm
Under Arizona v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
In Carson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 2:58 pm
Using the state’s Child Support Enforcement Services can have unintended results. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:40 am
Wang v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
Moran v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
Moran v. [read post]
District Court Judge Vacates DOL’s Modified Definition of “Companionship Services” Continue Reading…
16 Jan 2015, 9:22 am
Just over three weeks after vacating a regulation barring third party employers from claiming the companionship exemption for minimum wage and overtime, in a January 14, 2015 decision in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:22 am
Just over three weeks after vacating a regulation barring third party employers from claiming the companionship exemption for minimum wage and overtime, in a January 14, 2015 decision in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
Hardwick (1986), which rejected a privacy challenge to the state's power to make consensual "homosexual sodomy" a felony with a mandatory one year sentence. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:59 am
(10) Certain service-connected disability payments Any amount payable to an individual as a service-connected (within the meaning of section 101 (16) of title 38, United States Code) disability benefit under— (A) subchapter II, III, IV, V,,[1] or VI of chapter 11 of such title 38, or (B) chapter 13, 21, 23, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37, or 39 of such title 38 [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Myrick v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:42 pm
” The lawsuit, Blesch v. [read post]
