Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 3,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2010, 10:00 pm
See State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm
United States, Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:26 am
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., 504 F.3d 1262, 1267 (Fed. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument in Samantar v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm
[State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 4:28 pm
Doe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
In a recent Fairfax Circuit Court case, Travelers Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Re-listed case involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Title: Javitch, Block & Rathbone, LLP v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
Below, Jonathan Eisenman, an associate at Akin Gump, recaps Monday’s oral argument in Lewis v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
Below, Josh Friedman, an associate at Akin Gump, previews Lewis v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:13 pm
He concludes the first part thus: No IT professional or typical user would consider unallocated space to be a “backup” space, akin to an external drive or backup tape used to affirmatively back up files, simply because forensic searching could possibly locate therein lost files in their deleted or temporary states. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 7:49 am
As to EF's argument that Medi-Cal is akin to a loan in which Residents have an ownership interest, this argument was soundly rejected by the California Supreme Court in Kizer v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Stec v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR SE295 and Loiseau v France application no 46809/99, 18 November 2003 appear to contain suggestions that a civil right is an 'assetable right' akin to a 'private right arguably recognised under domestic law' or 'an individual right of which the applicant may consider himself the holder'. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Stec v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR SE295 and Loiseau v France application no 46809/99, 18 November 2003 appear to contain suggestions that a civil right is an 'assetable right' akin to a 'private right arguably recognised under domestic law' or 'an individual right of which the applicant may consider himself the holder'. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
