Search for: "Bull v. Bull" Results 2561 - 2580 of 3,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
Barr (involving immigration) and Ramos v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:59 am by gmlevine
Prefixes and suffixes generally do not create a distinctive name – a geographic identifier for example added to a well known trademark is no more than the well known trademark with a geographic identifier, Red Bull GmbH v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:10 pm
Brussels court in FN Herstal v Heckler & Koch wrestles with combination invention v mere aggregation of features. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
This conclusion – which looks to us to make new law – draws on comments made by the Advocate General in Case C‑119/10 Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH (see para 56) and perhaps on the principles enunciated in transit cases (such as Joined Cases C‑446/09 and C‑495/09), even though this case had nothing to with goods in transit through the EU.Not if there is a risk that the cigerettz will be put on the market in the EU even thoughthey are… [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am by INFORRM
” (Rothermere v Times Newspapers Ltd[1973] 1 WLR) The trial of the “Seven Bishops” ((1688) 3 Mod.Rep. 212 pdf) is generally taught as establishing this constitutional right as part of the story of Britain’s political progress. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The rulings cited the Supreme Court’s landmark civil rights-era case, New York Times v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
On 26 April 2021, Nicklin J heard the last day of the Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon trial. [read post]