Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 14,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Bailey, administrator of the estate. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:59 am
The Agencies developed an administrative record including public comments, a hearing officer’s report and legal responses from the Delaware Department of Justice. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 3:30 am
Last term, in Trump v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
State v New York State Dept. of Civ. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
Yet in Griswold v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 9:52 am
The court also ruled that the government cannot relitigate issues that were decided in Al Otro Lado’s favor in AOL v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:28 am
The Court stated that using the certified record to prosecute administrative suspensions is a valid method still used by agencies and approved by the Court in Drake v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:26 am
The Ostankinskiy District Court of Moscow found that the statements were damaging for the reputation of the Administration of the Volgograd Region, as they could make numerous Internet users believe that the Administration has been involved in unclean and unethical – even if not unlawful and criminally punishable – activity condemned by society. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 8:34 am
LEXIS 50527, March 25, 2015) and dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies an inmate's complaint that correction officers threatened to assault him if he did not shave his beard that he wore because of his Muslim religious faith.In Gomez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
The Supreme Court this morning granted certiorari in Bilski v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 6:57 pm
As stated in White v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:26 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Code Revision Commission v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Quoting comments from the Supreme Court’s Rules Committee that discussed Berry v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:26 am
In Williams v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
" Citing Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the court said that the Medical Board "properly based its conclusion on its examination" of the Applicant and his medical records, which provided some credible evidence to support its findings. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
" Citing Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the court said that the Medical Board "properly based its conclusion on its examination" of the Applicant and his medical records, which provided some credible evidence to support its findings. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
In the wake of the Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 3:51 pm
In April of this year, the Supreme Judicial Court explicitly stated in Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 3:53 pm
Office of the United States Trustee v. [read post]
