Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 2561 - 2580 of 16,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Tesar, “Effective tax rates in macroeconomics: cross-country estimates of tax rates on factor incomes and consumption,” Journal of Monetary Economics 34:3 (1994). [read post]
9 May 2021, 6:42 am by Giles Peaker
(…) It was apparent from his cross examination of the witnesses that Mr Baird knew all. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
  These cases are now more clearly outlining the legal framework within which the political and economic discretion of states is  now or ought to be constrained--even beyond their domestic constitutional orders--by their international obligations to ensure that their national policies do not produce harm beyond their borders whether directly or through the cross border operations of their instrumentalists. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm by Joshua Braver
§ 2383 provides: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:11 pm by Evelyn Douek
Confirming this process, however, gets at one of the most problematic parts of Facebook’s approach to content moderation: Who does the “cross-check”? [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:03 am by SHG
The student quoted a passage from a 1993 New Jersey Supreme Court decision, State v. [read post]
The idea behind the popular trope, “You can’t yell fire in a crowded theater” comes from Schenck v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:22 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Brittany Blakey The Texas Supreme Court in Concho Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am by CMS
Google reviewed the relevant case law on CPR 19.6(1), arguing that the authorities (in particular, Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways plc [2011] Ch 345 and Rendlesham Estates plc. v Barr Ltd [2015] 1 WLR 3663) supported its position. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 10:13 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
She also argued the hearing was flawed because she was not allowed to cross-examine John Doe, based on Doe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:04 am by Jan von Hein
Secondly, by examining more briefly the significance for the EU and its Member States of the change in the UK’s status from Member State to third country. [read post]