Search for: "Does, 1-20" Results 2561 - 2580 of 27,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2017, 6:31 am
 (2)      Is [Regulation No 6/2002], particularly Article 20(1)(c), to be interpreted as meaning that a third party may depict a Community design for commercial purposes if it intends to sell accessory items for the right holder’s goods corresponding to the Community design? [read post]
27 May 2019, 2:31 am
 Lastly, Rule 20(1) of that regulation provides that if, before the expiry of the period set by EUIPO under Rule 19(1) of that regulation the opposing party has not proven all the elements of Rule 19(2) the opposition shall be rejected as unfounded.Is the EUIPO bound by the trade mark's order chosen by the party in examining the opposition? [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners were continuously employed by school district from September 1, 2008 through July 1, 2015 and that Page, Terranova and Valvo were each appointed by the Board on June 16, 2008. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
 1)], in opposition [proceedings], does the applicant, as the defendant to the opposition, have the right to invoke prior rights which could constitute prior rights to the earlier trademark used as a prior right in the opposition? [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 11:00 am
The DOE provides primary and secondary education to more than 1 million pre-kindergarten to grade 12 students in more than 1,400 schools. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am by Ray Mullman
New York, which charges $20 a check, earns more than $250,000 a year. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am by Nico Cordes
Rule 76(1) and (2)(c) EPC does not contain any further requirements regarding the content or quality of the notice of opposition. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 11:17 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
However, it does reflect how a punitive damage award can substantially increase the amount one is compensated. [read post]
31 May 2016, 7:44 pm by Bill Marler
, but at least the FDA posted General Mills press release (seriously, why does a government website post this self-serving fluff?) [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 6:55 am by John Jascob
Importantly, the SEC amended federal Rule 504 to increase the offering amount limitation from $1 million to $5 million, effective January 20, 2017. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am by Howard Friedman
It also held that RLUIPA does not authorize damage claims against officials in their individual capacities.In United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:59 am by John Jascob
Under Rule 203(l)-1(c)(4), a “qualifying portfolio company” is defined as any company that at the time of any investment by the private fund is not “reporting” or “foreign traded” and does not control, is not controlled by, or under common control with another company, that is reporting or foreign traded.Willkie’s first example. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The question is complicated and requires consideration but this blawgger would lean in favour of disclosure at least after the resolution of the dispute between the State and the private person.Secondly, Section 22 of the RTI contains a non-obstante clause; so does Section 75 of the 1996 Act. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:07 am by Jani Ihalainen
After a lengthy battle in the EUIPO, spanning nearly 20 years, a case dealing with the same subject matter has faced its ultimate decision in the CJEU.The case of Yoshida Metal Industry Co. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:33 am by Chris Jaglowitz
  Exhibit superfluous documents like first year budgets (for a 20 year-old condo) or any other materials that are expired or are not strictly required by s. 76(1);   5. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
” The court additionally noted that, under F.R.C.P. 4(h)(1)(A), a corporation may be served “in the manner prescribed by Rule 4(e)(1) for serving an individual. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 3:34 am
Precedential No. 1: TTAB Dismisses Opposition to TEQUILA Certification Mark ApplicationDiscovery/Evidence/Procedure: Precedential No. 32: TTAB Defers Decision on Motion to Strike Testimony DeclarationPrecedential No. 31: TTAB Dismisses Section 2(d) Claim Due to Lack of Use of Opposer's Foreign Mark in USAPrecedential No. 30: Party that Cross-Examines Testimony Declarant Bears The ExpensesPrecedential No. 29: TTAB Refuses to Disqualify Itself in TRUMP-Related Cancellation… [read post]