Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 2561 - 2580 of 4,707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2014, 5:51 am
Indeed, Plaintiff owns two registered U.S. trade marks, one for “Don Henley” in class 9, for musical sound recordings, and the other in class 41, for entertainment services. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm by CJLF Staff
  Wilson was given the maximum sentence for the killing, as the state of Illinois does not have the death penalty. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 2:18 pm by emagraken
(For some discussion of these purposes, see Halbauer at para. 41.) [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
 The Report does not specify at which level such mediation should take place. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Does this mean the Court will be ending the practice of relisting cases to check for vehicle problems? [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:49 am
Does anyone have a copy or  a link?] [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:12 am
In June 2008, the Board granted the motion to amend, but noted that "amending the filing basis of the opposed application to Section 1(b) does not protect the application from the fraud claim. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:52 am by Guest Blogger
Rev. 1, 8, n.41 (2014) (cataloguing examples of the same). [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:36 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Grooveshark Infringed Record Labels’ Copyrights – U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
That’s what a Minnesota statute — now being challenged before the Minnesota Court of Appeals — does: Subdivision 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Int'l L. 1 (2004)7174Dogan, Stacey L.; Lemley, Mark A.Trademarks and Consumer Search Costs on the Internet [article] 41 Hous. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
The Union timely filed objections, including, as Objection 1, its claim that Rojas’ translation was a threat to report employees to immigration authorities…. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
The Inner House agreed stating that “the harbouring or communication of general anxieties or concerns, in a manner which does not clearly call for the full and honest disclosure of factual information in reply”[9] does not engage the duty to disclose risks when asked. [read post]